Close

Possession With Intent to Distribute

Alabama drug possession with intent to distribute charges are prosecuted very aggressively in the state of Alabama. These type of charges often involve perceived threats to the general public, and they can have a lasting impact on both an individual’s personal life and their professional careers. This charge can often bar an individual from receiving a loan in the future, or getting into an institute of higher education. To avoid drug possession and distribution penalties, it is crucial that you hire an experienced Alabama possession with intent to distribute lawyer immediately. An experienced drug attorney in Alabama will be able to gather all necessary facts of the case and determine the best defense to assist in getting you the best case outcome.

Is Drug Possession and Distribution a Felony in Alabama?

In Alabama, possession with intent to distribute is defined as any person that is in possession of a controlled substance other than when lawfully authorized. A possession with intent to distribute lawyer in Alabama can help an individual understand the specifics of their particular charge. These charges are frequently penalized depending on the drug, which may include:

  • Cocaine – eight grams to 28 grams
  • Heroin – two to four grams
  • Methamphetamines – eight to 28 grams

These offenses are class B felonies, which mandate a minimum sentence of between two and 20 years, and up to a $30,000 fine. The law enforcement officer investigating and prosecuting the case has the determining decision of whether to charge simple possession or possession with intent to distribute. This normally is looked at by the weight of the certain substances that are found at the time of the investigation. This is often an incredibly complex process, requiring the knowledge of an experienced attorney.

How Does the Prosecutor Handle Burden of Proof?

In Alabama, there are two basic ways the state can prove possession: either actual or constructive. Actual is what it sounds like, where the drug is in his or her hand, in a person’s pocket, or in his or her sock; constructive possession is looked at from outside factors.

To prove a constructive possession case, the state must prove that the person:

  1. Had knowledge of a controlled substance and
  2. An intent to exercise what we call “dominion and control” over that substance.

Ultimately, the fundamental element that a prosecutor must prove in Alabama on an intent to distribute case will be both the possession by the defendant, which can be proved either through an actual possession or constructive possession, and then the specificity and weight of the actual controlled substance. A law enforcement officer must also prove that the weight of that particular controlled substance fell within a statutory range that makes it unlawful possession with intent versus simple unlawful possession. A possession with intent to distribute lawyer in Alabama can build an appropriate defense to best combat an individual’s charge.

Evaluating the Charge

Sometimes, a drug case will begin as simple possession and then evolve at a later date to possession with intent to distribute. A lot of times, law enforcement officers hold this over a defendant to try to get them to cooperate. If they will not cooperate, the law enforcement officer will seek a higher charge, for example, the intent to distribute versus simple possession. Intent to distribute in Alabama ups the range of penalties from simple possession (class C felony) to a class B felony. In Alabama, intent to distribute a controlled substance is charged typically by way of arrest on warrant and, sometimes, by way of indictment from a grand jury.

In Alabama, the determining factor for an intent to distribute is viewed by the quantities and weight of the various substances or illegal controlled substances somebody is deemed to be in possession of. In terms of investigation, those things are focused on when trying to bring the charge. Further, if somebody is in possession of more than one controlled substance, they could be charged with simple possession of one and then intent to distribute the other, depending on the weight and quantities involved.

Potential Alabama Drug Possession and Intent Penalties

The potential penalties for a possession with intent to distribute are the same whether the charge is brought by way of warrant or by way of grand jury indictment. This is penalized with a minimum of a two-year prison sentence up to a 20-year prison sentence. Due to the severity of these penalties, the assistance of an Alabama possession with intent to distribute attorney is invaluable.

Diversion Programs or Alternative Sentencing

In Alabama, there are pre-trial diversion programs and “drug court” programs that are typically available for first-time offenders of simple possession charges. Possession with an intent to distribute is looked at on a case-by-case basis, with many district attorney offices and drug court programs disqualifying someone from participation in these programs because of the intent to distribute.

Many times, however, a good lawyer can mitigate the intent to distribute down to simple possession and therefore allow the defendant to participate in the drug court or diversionary program.

Importance of a Criminal Defense Attorney at This Stage

It is very important in Alabama to have an attorney when facing any type of drug charge because of the seriousness of the offense, the long-term life impact that a conviction could have, and also the serious penalties that the court could hand out. An attorney can assess their situation, put up a straightforward defense to the case, and give an individual the best chance possible to mitigate the penalties and/or be found not guilty.


Client Reviews
★★★★★
Whitney Polson is a no-nonsense attorney who delivered exactly what he said he would on my case...thank you so much sir...I would definitely recommend anyone facing a DUI to retain this man. D.B.
★★★★★
If you are looking for an attorney I must recommend Mark Polson of Polson & Polson. My case was successfully moved from a February to a December court date and was dismissed. I am extremely please with the way this firm handled the case and was able to secure the dismissal. Thank you again to Polson & Polson for your professionalism and knowledge that we needed for this situation. Best Regards to all. Julie C.
★★★★★
Wow! I never could have hoped for our lawyer to work as fast as he did but Whitney was lightning fast! Very attentive to the details, never left me hanging along the journey-I used online reviews in choosing him and now I want to pass that on-if you need a lawyer (ours was a traffic court case with complications), I HIGHLY recommend this firm! Claire B.
Contact Us